Prevalence of cannabidiol (CBD) consumption and cancer patients' expectations in one oncology day-hospital: A cross-sectional study and questionnaire validation.

INTRODUCTION: The growing interest of cannabidiol (CBD) in medical care prompted French health authorities to explore the potential of CBD in cancer-related severe symptoms. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CBD use among cancer patients with potential associated factors and to measure the cancer patient's health literacy (HL) on CBD consumption. METHODS: In a prospective study in oncology day-care hospital including patients from 29 October to 20 December 2021, we collected demographic, biological, and oncological characteristics. Patient CBD HL was measured by the hetero-questionnaire 8-item-CBD HL scale (HLS-8-CBD) whose conception has been validated by a psychometric analysis. RESULTS: Among 363 participants, 20 patients (5.5%) reported CBD use. Factors associated with CBD use were: age <60 years (odd ratio = 7.80[1.36-13.32], p < 10-4 versus ≥60 years), smoking history (OR = 5.53[1.81-16.88], p < 0.01), and no smoking cessation (OR = 5.07[1.66-15.46], p < 0.01). CBD use was also associated with a better CBD total HL score than non-users (p-value = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Identification of factors associated with CBD use and a relatively high patient CBD HL in CBD users showed that CBD use in cancer patients care represented a new concern and should enhance health professionals to consider CBD with its associated drug-related problems.

Cannabidiol-drug interaction in cancer patients: A retrospective study in a real-life setting.

Cannabidiol (CBD) consumption in cancer patients is growing and there is a need to investigate how to detect cannabidiol-drug interactions (CDIs). However, CDIs and the clinical relevance between CBD, anticancer treatment, supportive care and conventional drugs is poorly studied especially in real-life settings. In 1 oncology day-hospital, a cross-sectional study in 363 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy revealed 20 patients (5.5%) who consumed CBD. In this study we aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical relevance of CDIs among these 20 patients. CDI detection used the Food and Drug Administration Drugs.com database and clinical relevance was assessed accordingly. Ninety CDIs with 34 medicines were detected (4.6 CDI/patient). The main clinical risks were central nervous system depression and hepatoxicity. The main CDIs were assessed as moderate and anticancer treatment do not seem to add to the risk. CBD discontinuation appears to be the most consistent management. Future studies should explore the clinical relevance of drug interactions with CBD in cancer patients.